Quantcast
Channel: Healthcare IT News - Electronic Health Records (EHR, EMR)
Viewing all 1989 articles
Browse latest View live

Countries worldwide share perspectives on pandemic-era digital innovation

$
0
0

The COVID-19 crisis has shown in no uncertain terms the value and criticality of having a digitised and connected healthcare ecosystem: one that enables easy access to near-real-data, supports the demands of virtual care, prioritises patient experience and protects patient data.

Every nation's experience with this pandemic has been different – just as their own efforts to advance and innovate their information and technology infrastructures have their own unique imperatives.

But certain best practices are universal, and by sharing perspectives internationally, countries around the world are benefiting from others' hard-won experience.

Today, as part of the  HIMSS & Health 2.0 European Digital Conference, healthcare leaders from Australia, India and the UK compared notes about their own respective experiences building digital maturity as they simultaneously responded to a global pandemic.

During the session, A New Era Digital Maturity: International Views from the Top, Meredith Makeham, associate dean for community and primary healthcare at the University of Sydney; Lav Agarwal, joint secretary in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare at the Indian Administrative Service; and Dr Simon Eccles, chief clinical information officer for Health and Social Care at NHS England discussed the value of such cross-nation collaboration.

Specifically, they touted the value of groups such as the Global Digital Health Partnership, which convenes government agencies from countries and territories, along with the World Health Organisation, to enable more effective rollouts and improvements in digital health services.

The pandemic has put a spotlight on the "pressing need to accelerate the digital maturity of our health systems to continue improving the health and wellbeing of our citizens," according to the session, and that depends on international cooperation.

Tim Kelsey, senior vice president of HIMSS Analytics International, convened Makeham, Agarwal and Eccles to discuss how that collaboration is "driving and accelerating digital health," and how sharing between governments is helping agencies and health ministries better understand "what does and doesn't work" and – crucially – "how do we maintain the momentum, toward broader adoption of digital health?"

Agarwal said the key is to dive into the details of interoperability specifications, for instance. Beyond enabling governments to "share international best practices," he said, groups like the GDHP can help with "coordination and implementation of global information standards. And also to work toward accelerated adoption of innovative technologies."

Makeham said Australia has taken lessons from other countries not just about digital health strategy, but also its response to the pandemic itself.

"We've had the benefit of being somewhat behind the rest of the world and we've been able to learn from other countries across the world about what's working and what's not and try to quickly get reforms into place," she said.

She also noted that COVID-19 "has forced us to accelerate some of those digital innovations which we were working on and were coming … but I don't think those innovations would have happened so quickly."

Telehealth, for instance, has seen huge growth in Australia, just as it has in many other countries around the world.

"There's no guidebook for this," said Makeham about the challenges of innovating during a pandemic. "People are trying to do the best they can. And that's why organisations like GDHP are so important. It's a wonderful example of an open, transparent sharing of government knowledge and insights about what's good for patient safety, patient empowerment and ensuring health for all."

For his part, Eccles echoed her comments, noting that COVID-19 has forced a "a different approach to digital," at NHS, "and at a pace we had never previously considered."

Understanding that "we had limited time to act," as lockdowns went into place and the novel coronavirus spread, the UK saw a rapid and massive scale up of online care in response to COVID-19, he said.

Pre-pandemic, 83% of primary care was face-to-face, he explained. During its height, that number was 10% – and the rest was digital.

"We did it," said Eccles, relievedly, of that massive and fast-paced transformation. "Which for anyone experienced in digital transformation projects seems bordering on insane. It was brilliant. And the degree of buy-in to the need to radically change how people work was just fantastic."

Now, with the stage set to build on that progress, and further foreground patient empowerment and self-service, he said.

"That degree of system and service transformation would have taken us years, previously."

Register now to attend the HIMSS & Health 2.0 European Digital Conference and keep up with the latest news and deveopments from the event here.

Twitter: @MikeMiliardHITN
Email the writer: mike.miliard@himssmedia.com

Healthcare IT News is a publication of HIMSS Media.


Collective Medical will support predictive alerts and analytics in MO hospitals

$
0
0

The Hospital Industry Data Institute, the data company of the Missouri Hospital Association, recently announced that it had selected Collective Medical to upgrade HIDI's hospital-owned statewide platform and deliver care teams data in near real-time.

According to the MHA, the platform upgrade for HIDI participants includes the ability to identify, track and coordinate care for patients with COVID-19 – an issue of continued importance in a state with nearly 95,000 confirmed cases

The system also allows for notifications to be pushed directly into existing workflows to help care teams determine next steps for patients who need additional resources.

"Hospitals are investing in this system to improve the value of our state’s health care system, with an emphasis on the Medicaid program,” said Herb B. Kuhn, MHA president and CEO. 

"The HIDI-Collective partnership will create critical infrastructure to help accelerate this reform – bringing value and cost reduction in the near and long term for Medicaid and, as the program expands, for all stakeholders," he added.

WHY IT MATTERS

The Jefferson City-based HIDI currently supports more than 2,000 hospitals and parent hospital associations in making data-informed decisions. According to MHA representatives, HIDI's partnership with Collective will use analytics to identify risk and help reduce emergency department use and inpatient readmissions.

When fully implemented, the organization says, the platform will provide predictive "smart alerts" within HIDI providers' workflow about patients who need care, particularly those at a higher risk for being readmitted.

"Rapid delivery of data about patients as they move through the health care system can help improve quality and safety,” said Dr. Jonathan Heidt, board member of the Missouri College of Emergency Physicians, in a statement. 

"Data can enhance the health care system’s ability to build a team of providers and services around the patient, leading to better health outcomes," Heidt continued.

Collective, an ADT-based collaboration network headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, integrates alongside electronic health records and health information exchanges to highlight patient insights for providers. 

THE LARGER TREND

The need to empower health systems and hospitals with patient data has become increasingly important amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Earlier this year, some systems (including Missouri) reported periods of "data darkness" in response to a move by the U.S. Department Health and Human Services to overhaul the patient information reporting system.

Some vendors have stepped up to help make the response more robust, including Collective, which rolled out a new tool in March to assist officials in tracking, identifying and locating those across the country at risk of contracting the disease.

ON THE RECORD

"By facilitating the sharing of highly targeted, statistically significant predictive alerts with front-line providers who can immediately take action on behalf of a patient, and then by connecting those same patients with downstream primary and post-acute clinical resources, HIDI’s platform, in partnership with Missouri-area health information exchanges, ensures that stakeholders from different organizations can all operate as though they were on the same team, in some sense, with a crystal ball – because they are on the same team when caring for a shared patient,” said Chris Klomp, CEO of Collective Medical, in a statement.

Kat Jercich is senior editor of Healthcare IT News.
Twitter: @kjercich
Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.

Practice merges telehealth, AI and voice to decrease admin workload

$
0
0

Florida’s Orlando Internal Medicine had relied heavily on manual efforts to facilitate administrative tasks.

THE PROBLEM

Many of the challenges it was facing had obstacles that affected both patients and providers in the telehealth setting. For example:

  • Physicians had to initiate virtual health sessions by manually calling their patients, which contributed to missed appointments and a resulting lower care-capacity.
  • Medical assistants had to manually let physicians know that their intakes for patients were complete, instead of using an electronic notification process that would have facilitated the visit in a more-structured, time-efficient way.
  • Physicians faced difficulty accessing lab results and other electronic health record content while on the call with the patient, which resulted in further delays.

“One hour of patient care followed two hours that were spent on administrative tasks, capturing and uploading patient data and documentation into the EHR and searching for and pulling up relevant information for each patient seen in the clinic,” said Dr. Pradeep Vangala, a physician at Orlando Internal Medicine.

“This inordinate amount of time spent on administrative tasks is an inefficiency that leads to an increase in stress and physician and staff burnout,” he said.

PROPOSAL

So the group practice turned to artificial intelligence and voice technology from health IT vendor Andor Health. Implementation was an expedited process; it took less than two weeks. The technology was able to scale with the increased number of patients that Orlando Internal Medicine was seeing virtually.

“Microsoft Teams provided the framework for virtual visits and ThinkAndor allowed us to push real-time clinical information to care teams and staff right to the Teams’ call using a configuration tool,” Vangala explained. “With the AI virtual assistant from Andor Health with the help of Microsoft Teams, we were able to create a workflow better equipped with the patient and provider in mind.”

"One example is dictation, saving our providers 8-10 minutes per patient that would have otherwise been spent writing progress notes on patient visits."

Dr. Pradeep Vangala, Orlando Internal Medicine

The group practice previously had experiences with a number of other standalone telemedicine tools, forcing it to use multiple platforms to properly access information it needed for each patient. It was not a sustainable long-term strategy.

“The platform from Andor Health integrated with Microsoft Teams provides a much smoother experience,” Vangala said. “The implementation was quick, and it was easy to train our staff on. The clinical integration was unmatched and greatly aids our physicians in session during virtual visits. The internal communications chat function also drove our decision, since this helped to keep our care teams up to date on patient status reports and [was] a way for physicians to get care recommendations from other providers within the practice.”

MEETING THE CHALLENGE

The artificial intelligence aspect of the platform reduced much of the time that would have been spent on administrative tasks by delivering critical, context-sensitive intelligence from disparate EHR systems across multiple care settings, Vangala explained. The practice’s providers have immediate access to patient data, including labs, X-rays and other tests.

“This has created improved operational efficiencies for our care providers,” he said. “One example is dictation, saving our providers 8-10 minutes per patient that would have otherwise been spent writing progress notes on patient visits. Our physicians are now seeing an estimated 125 patients each week and they are spending more time consulting with our patients and less time on administrative follow-up.”

As a comprehensive physician practice caring for a large volume of patients across ambulatory, acute-care, long-term acute-care and skilled nursing facilities, it is Orlando Internal Medicine’s responsibility to effectively collaborate with patients’ entire care team, both inside and outside its practice.

“Care coordination should involve an active communication stream, where care team members are notified instantly following an update in their patient’s care, including any immediate actions,” he stated. “If a patient is seen at a facility with a different EHR system, the care team is still notified – this is one of the prominent features of the technology.”

RESULTS

Since implementing the technology, Orlando Internal Medicine’s administrative workload has been reduced almost 60%, leading to an increase in clinical care capacity and reducing physician burnout. The result has dramatically improved patient care outcomes, and, in the end, created greater revenue streams for the practice, Vangala reported.

“Prior to implementation of ThinkAndor, we were conducting less than 10% of our visits virtually, even during the height of COVID-19, since other telemedicine technologies we had tried were not able to keep up with the workflow of our practice,” he said.

“The ThinkAndor AI bot feature has helped us achieve a 5x success rate with patients by transforming the operations of our practice, including aggregating patient data and identifying the discrete signals, alerts and workflows that need to be managed.”

The practice now is seeing patients exclusively using virtual tools with hundreds of visits per month, and 23-25 appointments seen daily.

“Since implementation, we have seen an increased productivity of clinical and administrative staff by 3x,” he reported. “This translates to eight to 12 minutes of staff time savings per patient in a virtual visit, allowing us to increase our clinical care capacity and the amount of patients we are able to see with the growing demand, especially during COVID-19.”

Within three days of sending a survey for patient feedback, the practice has received a 97% success rate, highlighting lower than average waiting room times at 4.6 minutes per patient and 16.4 minutes of direct one-on-one interaction with a physician or care team member. All of these metrics are leading to higher patient satisfaction rates.

ADVICE FOR OTHERS

“Patient outcomes are the No. 1 priority,” Vangala advised. “When looking to implement a platform, healthcare organizations should understand how it can positively impact physician and patient experience in the long term. In the long run, this is a more efficient way to communicate between health providers and patients, and we advise selecting a platform that can enable a long-term, sustainable virtual health strategy for your organization.”

One way to do this is to ensure one is choosing a platform with built-in AI and machine learning functionality for patients of any age and language, with solutions such as translation services, he added.

“As institutions look for platforms that provide sustainable solutions, asking questions like, ‘Will the platform still be viable in five or ten years?’ is important,” he said. “It also should easily integrate with any EHR and ideally not be complicated, working with ubiquitous communications platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom. Overall, choosing a virtual health platform to meet your institution’s needs should not be a cumbersome process. It should efficiently provide solutions to the growing demand for patient services.”

Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT
Email the writer: bill.siwicki@himss.org
Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.

Telehealth working ‘beyond our wildest dreams’ at Chicago’s Rush

$
0
0

Prior to the pandemic, Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, had been using Adobe Media Server integrated with its Epic electronic health record for telehealth video visits. The technology was thoroughly tested both onsite and offsite, with employees working from home, and had a high connection-failure rate of about 30%.

THE PROBLEM

Rush was relying on the patient’s home Internet connection to be good enough to connect, and five to six years ago it was common that home Internet was not good enough to stream content, even in the big city environs of Chicago. Unfortunately, there was very little troubleshooting staff could do once they realized that a patient’s Internet was not high-speed, and that led to many awkward calls between the IT helpdesk and patients.

Another barrier: Adobe Media Server relied on Flash player to be installed on a patient’s web browser, which was a fairly common plug-in for older PCs using standard browsers. But the world was moving to new browsers like Chrome and mobile applications and tablets, and Flash was no longer a standard.

“Not only did the patient need it installed, it also needed to be the right version, and Flash was so finicky that it would not auto-update; sometimes it needed to be uninstalled and reinstalled to take,” explained Marisa Truesdell, information systems manager at Rush University Medical Center. “Moving to telehealth technology from Vidyo was like night and day compared to the amount of patient technical issues and calls we received with Adobe Media Server.”

"Assemble a tenacious cross-functional team and get moving or you will be left behind. They should consist of the Ninja-Warrior-Salesperson-Writer-Conciliator-Researcher-Tech Geek variety."

Marisa Truesdell, Rush University Medical Center

Rush’s current connection failure rate is below 10% and Rush, like many other healthcare organizations, has defaulted to mobile-first workflows, which ensure a certain technology spec is met on the patient’s side, making the workflow much simpler for IT to support and the patient to connect, she added.

PROPOSAL

The Vidyo Connect workflow resolved the problems. The new platform allows for Rush’s bandwidth to provide extra buffering if the patient’s Internet speed is not quite up to snuff. It also does not require the patient to download anything extra, and they can be on any mobile device and most browsers to connect to telemedicine visits.

“Troubleshooting the workflow for visits using Vidyo Connect now can be done by a layperson – typically a medical assistant virtually rooming the patient for their video visit – instead of an IT telemedicine expert,” Truesdell said. “This was essential for the ability to scale our telemedicine platform.”

MARKETPLACE

There are many vendors of telemedicine technology and services on the health IT market today. Healthcare IT News recently compiled a comprehensive list of these vendors with detailed descriptions. To read this special report, click here.

MEETING THE CHALLENGE

About the fifth week of the pandemic in the United States, the state of Illinois shut down except for essential services. What did this mean to a large, academic healthcare institution? All non-emergent surgeries and all nonurgent appointments were cancelled. Rush had a staff typically used to seeing approximately 50,000 patients per month that was now asking to be redeployed to do other work so its members wouldn't be furloughed.

“There was only one practical option: Rapid implementation of HIPAA-compliant telemedicine workflows,” Truesdell said. “The workflows we implemented at first were four standard flows that we made available immediately and trained physicians on over the course of a few weeks: New Patient Scheduled Telephone, Return Patient Scheduled Telephone, New Patient Video and Return Patient Video.”

On the patient’s end, they would receive custom appointment reminder texts via Rush’s texting vendor, Mutare, at seven days, three days and one day prior to their scheduled virtual visit, reminding them to electronically check in and log in to join the video visit 10 minutes prior to its start.

Every day, medical assistants monitor the schedule for upcoming telemedicine visits. If there is a video visit coming up and the patient has joined, a medical assistant jumps on to gather normal rooming documentation and greet the patient.

If the patient has not joined, Truesdell’s team developed custom ad hoc text message buttons that medical assistants can press in specific situations to remind the patient what to do next in order to connect to their visit and to provide troubleshooting documentation.

“For physicians, medical assistants and other supportive providers like interpreters, they can see if the patient is connected right from their Epic EHR schedule via a grey camera icon that turns green when the patient is connected,” Truesdell explained.

“Medical assistants set a dot on the schedule as well letting the physician know the patient is ready. All providers can join the visit the same way. We require two devices in order to perform telemedicine: 1) They should be at a workstation that has Epic hyperspace on it, so they can document during their visit like they would for an in-person visit, and 2) They need an iPad with Epic’s mobile physician application Canto.”

The physician can launch the video visit directly from their navigator in Epic and have the screen thrown to their iPad, which acts as their video camera as well. Generally, the call moves forward like any other video call, with the important exception that it is being launched from HIPAA-compliant platforms that are protected by encryption and the appropriate legal agreements with Rush’s vendors.

“Rush was able to leverage the energy generated from the crisis to completely roll out a HIPAA-compliant video platform, which was the right solution, instead of something that was potentially more convenient but not HIPAA-compliant that ultimately would need to be ripped and replaced,” Truesdell said.

RESULTS

Rush’s KPIs for telehealth are “beyond our wildest dreams,” Truesdell said, especially given Rush serves a state lacking payer parity. She points to two work streams. First, forward COVID-19 triage.

“When COVID-19 first hit, and Rush was working on setting up a command center and ED triage tent, our CMO Paul Casey had the brilliant idea to repurpose our on-demand video platform for forward COVID-19 triage,” Truesdell explained.

“Redeploying 183 outpatient physicians to cover the video lines, we set up our platform in a matter of days to be able to triage patients with COVID-19 symptoms, exposure and anxiety to the right level of care – be that the ED, a drive-through testing location, or just isolating at home at the guidance of a compassionate physician, directly from our My Rush app.”

At the end of the video visit, the patient automatically is sent a detailed clinical recommendation via the My Rush app and assigned appropriate educational videos to watch about their condition, in addition to any referrals or prescriptions being sent to their preferred pharmacy.

Thus far this year, Rush has completed 8,718 on demand video visits, which have approximately a 23-minute wait on average, 22% new-to-system patients, and a Net Promoter score on average of 89. Some 52% of these visits were for concern for coronavirus.

The second work stream Truesdell points to is scheduled video visits. Rush was able to greatly improve KPIs here.

“When outpatient clinics closed due to the pandemic, most staff were redeployed to deliver services via telemedicine,” she said. “Having staff that are immediately ready to engage with technology in this way was unprecedented. Our providers immediately took to the process and engaged with us to provide quick solutions and optimizations. This operational/IT collaboration resulted in patient care – virtually, where there would otherwise have been none.”

So far this year, Rush has performed 90,533 scheduled video visits with an average Net Promoter score of 80. Some 25% of these have been scheduled into same-day or next-day availability; 2% of these patients have been new to the system; and10% of them have been new to practice.

ADVICE FOR OTHERS

“First I would say that this is the future: Assemble a tenacious cross-functional team and get moving, or you will be left behind,” Truesdell advised. “They should consist of the Ninja-Warrior-Salesperson-Writer-Conciliator-Researcher-Tech Geek variety. Virtual care is not for the faint of heart, so you want to find a team that is resilient, creative and never takes ‘No’ for a final answer.”

Second, shop around, she cautioned. Telehealth is even more of a hot topic in the COVID-19 world, and video technology is now ubiquitous and getting cheaper by the day.

“Most vendors are not going to be able to offer much to distinguish themselves in today’s cutthroat market, except price,” she concluded. “All vendors are working on usability, so soon there will be no way to distinguish between them in that space either. The real missing link in virtual care is an all-in-one vendor that does it all and integrates it all seamlessly – e-visit to scheduling, to video visit, to remote monitoring, etc. This is where your ninja team comes in, and why we IT folk have job security … for now!”

Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT
Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org
Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.

Judge dismisses data privacy suit against University of Chicago and Google

$
0
0

Back in 2019, Healthcare IT News reported on a unique privacy case involving Google and the University of Chicago Medical Center– which had been named as defendants in a class action suit alleging that they'd failed to properly de-identify data used for machine learning research and predictive analytics projects.

The suit's plaintiff, Daniel Dinerstein, who was a patient at UChicago in 2015, alleged that, while Google and UCMC claimed the medical records used were de-identified, such a claim was "misleading."

Given that the data provided to Google by the university "included detailed datestamps and copious free-text notes," he alleged, the tech giant's expertise in data mining and artificial intelligence made it "uniquely able to determine the identity of almost every medical record the university released."

On September 4, Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted the University of Chicago and Google's motions to dismiss the suit.

"Plaintiff suggests that the risk of re-identification was in fact substantial because of the information Google already possesses about individuals through the other services it provides," Pallmeyer writes in her decision.

"Specifically, the amended complaint refers to Google as 'one of the largest and most comprehensive data mining companies in the world, drawing data from thousands of sources and compiling information about individuals’ personal traits (gender, age, sexuality, race), personal habits, purchases, and associations.' Google has 'create[d] detailed profiles of millions of Americans,' including public and nonpublic information, and 'possess[es] detailed geolocation information that it can use to pinpoint and match exactly when certain people entered and visited the University’s hospital,' according to the amended complaint," she explained.

"In fact, for a user of Google applications like Mr. Dinerstein, Google can track the specific University hospital buildings or departments he visited and the time of his visits. Plaintiff alleges that the combination of such geolocation information and the EHRs, which include the date and time of hospital services, 'creates a perfect formulation of data points for Google to identify who the patients in those records really are.' The amended complaint does not allege, however, that Google has in fact used its extensive data to re-identify any EHRs."

De-identification, re-identification

The use of de-identified data has been common for years, of course. But so have challenges around keeping it that way. As far back as 2010, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT was studying how to manage the privacy risks presented by health information that had been stripped of personal identifiers – the potential for "re-identification."

The contours of this University of Chicago case are similar in some respects to the so-called "Project Nightingale" initiative between Google and Ascension, which got lots of mainstream media attention this past November, amid concerns over how the Mountain View, California, company was using patient data to help inform its design of new AI and machine learning software for Ascension.

In many respects, the collaboration "is not unlike arrangements that happen every day in America between hospitals and other covered entities and contractors performing services on their behalf," Deven McGraw, former deputy director for health information privacy at the HHS Office for Civil Rights and now chief regulatory officer at health data startup Ciitizen, said at the time. "Many hospitals have hundreds of business associates, all with extensive access to PHI.

But Google isn't just any vendor, McGraw acknowledged. It "has access to so much other data about individuals," she said, and therefore understood concerns that "it may not be possible for data to be truly de-identified in their hands, given all of the data to which they have access."

As long as Google "fulfills its privacy and security obligations under HIPAA with regard to the protected health information provided by Ascension, there is no HIPAA issue on the face of things," added healthcare attorney Matthew Fisher, partner at Westborough, Massachusetts-based Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee. "However, given the enormous amount of data held by Google, a maybe not so academic question exists of whether data can be de-identified when in Google’s possession."

 

Twitter: @MikeMiliardHITN
Email the writer: mike.miliard@himssmedia.com

Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.

DeWitt Hospital remotely installs cloud-based EHR that helps with COVID-19 care

$
0
0

DeWitt Hospital is a critical access hospital in DeWitt, Arkansas. It provides emergency and outpatient services for rural Southeastern Arkansas. The hospital is equipped with a radiology department, a laboratory department, a respiratory department and an emergency room. It also operates a nursing home attached to the hospital, the Ferguson Rural Health Clinic, and the local ambulance and paramedic services.

THE PROBLEM

When Brian Miller joined DeWitt Hospital as CEO in January 2019, the hospital’s existing EHR from CPSI was sunsetting and the facility had nine months to find a replacement. Miller and staff knew they needed a system that was light on maintenance, updates and support; was able to adjust to different workflows and care levels; and was supported by a team willing to be a partner to the hospital, rather than just another vendor.

“It also was really important for us that our new EHR would be interoperable and could connect to the statewide SHARE health information exchange,” Miller explained. “We often transfer patients to other hospitals, and their medical data needs to transfer with them. On top of that, a lot of our patients have chronic conditions and receive health services from multiple providers, and their data is fragmented across each provider they receive treatment from.”

It is absolutely essential to continuity of care that clinicians have easy access to their patients’ medical records, no matter where the patient is coming from or where they have been treated in the past. By connecting to the SHARE HIE, DeWitt staff could access a unified longitudinal patient record, allowing clinicians and others in the state to make more informed decisions and improve the quality of care, Miller said.

PROPOSAL

For an EHR, DeWitt decided on vendor Azalea Health. Azalea came in with a cloud-based system that minimized IT spend and lift, reduced the need for training and expensive consulting services, and offered an interoperable approach that enabled DeWitt to connect to the SHARE HIE, while also connecting its facilities, so it could easily share patient data across its own network, Miller explained.

“The idea was simple: Azalea would deliver a system that limited the amount of upfront and long-term spend, empowered our hospital staff to customize the solution based on their clinical workflow, and unlocked our data so that we could have a unified view of the patient regardless of the care setting,” he said.

The move to a cloud-based EHR platform required a big shift in mindset for DeWitt.

"We made the right decision to go with a cloud-based EHR that helped us pivot to meet new demands for testing and tracking."

Brian Miller, DeWitt Hospital

“We were coming from an on-premise system that demanded time and dollars to maintain,” Miller said. “The interface was old and workflows were static. The idea of a cloud-based solution that we could quickly integrate into our existing technology ecosystem with very little lift was something totally new for the organization. And it was an approach we very much needed.”

MARKETPLACE

There are many vendors with electronic health records systems on the health IT market today, including Allscripts, athenahealth, Cerner, eClinicalWorks, Epic, Greenway Health, HCS, Meditech and NextGen Healthcare.

MEETING THE CHALLENGE

Right as DeWitt was moving from the integration stage of the EHR implementation into the support stages, COVID-19 hit.

“We were forced to finish the implementation remotely,” Miller said. “But it’s gone smoothly. Azalea simplified the process and worked to ensure integration into our existing radiology and lab solutions. They worked across our groups, including nursing, registration and IT, to make sure everyone was aligned, informed and prepared on Day One. Azalea has been a very supportive and attentive partner, and we still meet with them twice a week.”

The EHR vendor also played a big role in connecting DeWitt to the SHARE HIE. DeWitt is part of the Arkansas Rural Health Partnership (ARHP), a network of 14 rural hospitals that pools resources to better meet the unique needs of patients in their rural communities. When the pandemic started, Arkansas Blue Cross Blue Shield came to ARHP and provided the funding to connect all the rural hospitals in the partnership to the SHARE program.

For DeWitt, Azalea was instrumental in facilitating its connection to the SHARE HIE. With the vendor’s help, DeWitt became one of the first providers in Southern Arkansas to be connected to the SHARE program.

“The SHARE program has led to more informed care transitions between DeWitt and other local community clinic providers,” Miller explained. “We use the exchange to share episodic admission/discharge/transfer data, discharge summaries, radiology reports, image narratives, laboratory results, prescribed medications and clinical procedures. Our clinic gets 24-hour daily reports on all our patients, and we get notified in real time when any patient has an ED or inpatient discharge or if they test positive for COVID-19.”

RESULTS

Azalea also has supported DeWitt in testing the community for COVID-19. As one of the only places in the area to get tested, DeWitt had a lot of people coming to the clinic to get tested. One day the hospital had more than 100 tests, and that went on for about two weeks.

“What draws a lot of people is that they can get their test results in 15 minutes at our clinic instead of waiting a week,” Miller said. “This appeals a lot to local businesses. When the business is open and one employee tests positive, they need to test everybody. They don’t want to have to shut down for a long time, so rapid results are ideal.”

Testing kits were reallocated by HHS in late July. DeWitt still is testing people who come into the hospital. But the removal of these tests means that DeWitt does not have the resources to help local businesses test their employees. It’s an added strain to an already stressful situation.

“At its peak, the number of people coming in to get tested was more than double our normal patient volume,” Miller said. “With so many new people coming into our hospital, Azalea’s EHR has been a valuable tool for keeping track of new patients. Having this broader pool of patients in our records will be helpful for our recovery once we can ramp up elective procedures again.”

ADVICE FOR OTHERS

“The landscape has changed to the point where it’s difficult for smaller hospitals to stand alone and survive,” Miller remarked. “Larger hospitals have more access to funding and get better deals when purchasing equipment, but everything costs more for critical access hospitals. We’ve been fortunate enough to leverage our connection with Jefferson Regional Medical Center in Pine Bluff to use their buying power and save a lot of money on supplies.”

DeWitt is working to get the ARHP to a similar place, where the hospital can share resources between the 14 hospitals to secure grants, centralize staffing and acquire supplies at lower rates. Rural hospitals are in a tough place right now, and solidarity between hospitals might be the only way forward, Miller said.

It’s also important to understand the different kinds of solutions that are out there, the benefits and risks to each, and scalability to future demands, he added.

“We never would have anticipated COVID-19 and the resulting impact that it had on our hospital operations and data,” he concluded. “We made the right decision to go with a cloud-based EHR that helped us pivot to meet new demands for testing and tracking. And we have been fortunate to be part of the SHARE program, which is helping draw insights into the impact of COVID-19 on our community and the broader hospital network that serves Southeastern Arkansas.”

Twitter: @SiwickiHealthIT
Email the writer: bsiwicki@himss.org
Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.

How an EHR and HIE slashed opioid use by 46%

Widow sues Ciox Health and a NY hospital for failure to release husband's EHR data

$
0
0

A woman living in Woodstock, New York, has filed suit against HealthAlliance Hospital and the information management vendor Ciox Health for allegedly declining to release her deceased husband's electronic health records in a non-paper format.

The lawyer for the plaintiff, Sherry Russell, said that HealthAlliance Hospital's Broadway campus (formerly known as Kingston Hospital) has repeatedly directed her to Ciox for the records, which in turn allegedly told her she will have to pay 75 cents a page for photocopied paper versions.

"The maximum charge for electronic medical records under federal law is $6.50," said Russell's lawyer, John Fisher, in an interview with Healthcare IT News. "But if they charge for the paper copy of the records, it could be thousands of dollars."  

According to a 2016 guidance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, HIPAA-covered entities and business associates should either charge $6.50 to fulfill a record request or calculate fees based on the labor cost of doing so.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services lifted that cap on fees when it comes to organizations charging third parties, such as law firms, when releasing copies of electronic records. The fee cap for patients, however, remains in place.  

Fisher says that Russell's alleged treatment is a violation of the HITECH Act, which – among other provisions – requires HIPAA-covered entities to provide patients with an electronic copy of their records.   

According to Fisher, after the death of Russell's husband, Charlie, in October 2019, she requested his electronic health records in order to file a separate malpractice lawsuit against the hospital. Without the records, said Fisher, Russell cannot identify the physician involved in her husband's care. Ciox said that it could not comment on pending litigation; the Westchester Medical Health Network, of which HealthAlliance is a part, said it did not comment on ongoing litigation.  

WHY IT MATTERS

According to Fisher, in March 2017, Charlie Russell underwent a chest X-ray as part of a routine procedure. That X-ray showed a mass in his lung, but as Fisher told Healthcare IT News, neither Russell nor his wife were informed of it.  

The next March, Fisher said, Russell went in for another chest X-ray. This time, doctors found a six-centimeter mass in his lung. Further imaging showed cancer in his brain and liver.

Sherry Russell believes her husband's cancer could have been treated sooner, had the mass been identified and communicated about in 2017. She is planning to file a medical malpractice lawsuit. The deadline to sue is September 14, said Fisher, but Russell is relying on the electronic health records for her case.   

Fisher said he has other clients with similar experiences at HealthAlliance concerning their records, and that clients whose cases qualify could join onto Russell's class-action suit filed this past week.  

"We know firsthand that there are others" that have experienced problems obtaining their electronic health records, said Fisher.  

THE LARGER TREND  

The HIPAA Privacy Right Rule of Access guarantees patient access to physical or digital copies of healthcare records – and noncompliant health systems can face hefty fines. In 2019, Bayfront Health St. Petersburg had to pay the HHS Office of Civil Rights $85,000 and promise remediation after failing to give a pregnant woman timely access to her medical records.

Meanwhile, Ciox has been at the center of a number of lawsuits concerning the costs of electronic health records. In 2018, the company sued HHS over the $6.50 flat fee Fisher invoked, saying that it "bears no rational relationship to the actual costs associated with processing such requests."  

HHS, in turn, said that it couldn't actually enforce that flat fee against Ciox, because Ciox is a business associate, not a covered entity.

This lawsuit eventually led to the agency lifting the cap on fees for third-party organizations' requests for records.  

And last year, Ciox Health and the Wisconsin-based Aurora Health paid $35.4 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that accused the companies of overcharging for records requests.

Studies have shown other hospitals not complying with the HHS-recommended $6.50, with one reportedly charging more than $500 for a 200-page record.  

ON THE RECORD 

HealthAlliance, said Fisher, is "stonewalling our client and affecting her ability to bring a lawsuit."

 

Kat Jercich is senior editor of Healthcare IT News.
Twitter: @kjercich
Email: kjercich@himss.org
Healthcare IT News is a HIMSS Media publication.


Dubai Health Authority first in UAE to integrate UpToDate CDS resource

$
0
0

The United Arab Emirates’ Dubai Health Authority (DHA) has become the first healthcare authority in the country to integrate Wolters Kluwer’s clinical decision support (CDS) resource, UpToDate with an electronic medical record (EMR), it has been announced.

In a statement released by the US-headquartered information services and solutions company, the UpToDate integration allows doctors, nurses and pharmacists from 18 DHA sites to access it via the authority’s Salama EMR to “make evidence-based clinical decisions for their patients and keep their medical knowledge up to date in a more seamless way.”

As well as being accredited by the DHA, UpToDate also enables clinicians to gain Continuing Medical Education (CME) credits while applying their learnings from searches during clinical practice.

THE LARGER CONTEXT

According to Wolters Kluwer, UpToDate – reportedly used by over 1.9 million clinicians around the world – is the “only clinical decision support resource associated with improved patient outcomes and hospital performance.” 

It continued in a statement: “Over 100 independent studies evidence the benefit to patients, clinical teams and healthcare systems in terms of improving length of stay, efficiency and patient outcomes, and reducing error rates and healthcare costs.”

In 2018, a study published in the International Journal of Medical Informatics found a “significant association” between use of UpToDate CDS and reduced diagnostic errors, with physicians using UpToDate encountering a “significantly lower rate of diagnostic errors compared with a control group without UpToDate”.

Denise Basow, managing director, president and CEO for Clinical Effectiveness at Wolters Kluwer – Health stated: “We are delighted to support DHA in their vision to provide world class healthcare across Dubai. 

“Providing evidence-based clinical decision support in the clinical workflow is critical for driving consistent, standardised and high-quality care throughout a patient’s care journey.”

ON THE RECORD

Meanwhile, on his part, Younis Kazim, Dubai Healthcare Corporation CEO of DHA said: “Patient Safety is DHA’s number one priority and our goal is to be at the forefront of healthcare innovation that delivers significant benefits to patients.

“Making UpToDate accessible through the Salama EMR will support busy clinicians at the point of care to drive consistently high-quality care, minimise errors and improve hospital efficiency. We are pleased to partner with Wolters Kluwer on this mission.”

DHA’s Medical Education and Research Department Director, Wadeia Sharief added: “As a resource for medical education and daily practices, UpToDate at the point of care for all DHA healthcare professionals can be accessed through the library platform and smart devices.

“Integrating UpToDate into Salama showed light after great efforts from the library and Salama team to obtain and gain return on investment in patient care.”

Viewing all 1989 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images